- Hearing - Roles and Responsiblities Beginning 11 September 2012
- Hearing - Engineering Profession Beginning 10 September 2012
- Hearing - Building Management After Earthquakes Beginning 3 September 2012
- Hearing CTV Building Beginning 25 June 2012
- Hearing New Building Technologies Beginning 12 March 2012
- Hearing Srecko Cvetanov Submission 6 March 2012
- Hearing Forsyth Barr Beginning 23 February 2012
- Hearings About Other Buildings Whose Failure Resulted in Loss of Life Week 5
- Hearings About Other Buildings Whose Failure Resulted in Loss of Life Week 4
- Hearings About Other Buildings Whose Failure Resulted in Loss of Life Week 3 Beginning 30 January 2012
- Hearings Other Buildings Whose Failure Resulted in Loss of Life Week 2 Beginning 23 January 2012
- Hearings Other Buildings Whose Failure Resulted in Loss of Life Week 1 Beginning 12 December 2011
- Hearing Hotel Grand Chancellor Beginning 17 January 2012
- Hearing PGC Building Beginning 28 November 2011
- Hearing Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
Beginning 7 November 2011 - Hearing Soils Beginning 25 October 2011
- Hearing Seismicity Beginning 17 October 2011
Building Management After Earthquakes Hearing
On 3 and 4 September 2012, the Royal Commission conducted a public hearing looking at how New Zealand should manage buildings after earthquakes. This hearing considered how we should do this when we respond immediately after the disaster and also when moving from response into recovery. It looked at the building safety evalution (stickering) operations after the Canterbury earthquakes and what New Zealand can do to improve the system in the future.
The hearing provided the opportunity for debate about what the goals and objectives of building management after earthquakes should be. This was part of a wider discussion about who is responsible for the building safety evaluation process, both for developing it and in practice after a disaster. The hearing discussed how to manage buildings, given the need to prioritise how this should happen when numbers of buildings are damaged. It will also looked at who should carry out evaluations, what methods these evaluators should use, and how to ensure that these evaluators have the right skill sets while balancing the need to plan for a situation that occurs infrequently.
Participants included academics, senior practising engineers and professional engineering societies.
Timetable
Date | Time |
Presenter |
Topic |
3 September | 10am | Mark Zarifeh, Counsel Assisting the Commission | Opening statement |
10.20am | Dave Brunsdon, Director, Kestrel Group. | New Zealand's building safety evaluation process and how it was implemented in the Canterbury earthquakes | |
11.30am | BREAK | ||
11.45am | Dave Brunsdon (continued) | ||
1pm | BREAK | ||
2.15pm |
Bret Lizundia from the US (video conference) |
Peer review of Mr Brunsdon's presentation and the issues highlighted |
|
3.30pm |
BREAK |
|
|
3.45pm |
Bret Lizundia (continued) |
|
|
4.30pm |
Ken Gledhill of GNS |
Developments in operational modelling and communication that could assist the Council, building owners and occupants following an earthquake |
|
5.25pm |
ADJOURNMENT |
|
|
4 September | 9.30am |
|
Topics:
|
11.30am |
BREAK |
|
|
11.45am |
Panel discussion (continued) |
|
|
1.10pm |
BREAK |
|
|
2.15pm |
Panel discussion |
|
|
3.10pm |
HEARING COMPLETED |
|